KHOODEELAAR! told you so! In 2004, in 2005, in 2006, 2007 and in 2008 we said accurately that the UK economy was going down.. advice worth £Billions

Commented on the RICHMOND AND TWICKENHAM Times, London


http://www.richmondandtwickenhamtimes.co.uk/news/richmondnews/3830271.Anti_Heathrow_campaigners_suspicious_of_BAA___s_Crossrail_cash/

In that comment, KHOODEELAAR! Organizer Muhammad Haque set out the key arguments against Crossrail. Arguments that Simon Jenkins in his piece this week in the EVENING STANDARD has only partly covered. In fact the Muhammad Haque comments published in December 2006 on the Eddington Report remain the most accurate, detailed and valid ones to this day. And those comments, made TWO years before the ‘City of London’ became widely identified as containing “the greediest and the most corrupt and the wasteful elements in and of the UK economy”, were spot on as economic analysis. It is therefore important to point out again that the KHOODEELAAR! analysis of the UK economy as made in 2004 was unique in all key respects. It was accurate 5 years ahead of the events. It was responsible , contrary to the callous JOBBING comments on the economy contributed by all the ‘mainstream’ ‘economic commentators’ as employed, promoted, showcased and platformed by the UK ‘mainstream media’. And the Khoodeelaar! analysis is worth £Billions of savings in terms of avoided economic and financial peril and losses...
[To be continued]


By © Muhammad Haque 2005 Hrs GMT

London Saturday 8 November 2008

http://www.richmondandtwickenhamtimes.co.uk/news/richmondnews/3830271.Anti_Heathrow_campaigners_suspicious_of_BAA___s_Crossrail_cash/

“Your report confirms the analysis that KHOODEELAAR! the campaign against Crossrail scam has been publishing for the past almost 5 years. That Crossrail is not the main transport priority in and around London. That the EXISTING transport infrastructure and services warrant urgent attention. That there has been NO evidence of public demand for any of it. That EVEN Gordon Brown’s own expert reported in the Eddington Study on the future of the railway ‘service’s NO evidence for Crossrail. Indeed, as Channel 4 news expressly pointed out at the beginning of October 2007...Eddington had ADVISED AGAINST Crossrail. So what is the £16 Billion plus being spent on Crossrail for? Ken Livingstone acted as the propagandist in chief for the Big Business lobby pressing the UK Govt to fork out £ Billions under covers of transport. But even Livingstone failed to find ANY mentionable support in the UK public for Crossrail..In their reports on the formal publication of the Eddington Study, ALL of ‘Fleet Street’ and the BBC carried unfounded hype for Crossrail. The only major media organisation that got the EDDINGTON REPORT right on the facts and published the substance accordingly was the US media group Forbes. They accurately reported that Eddington HAD not endorsed Crossrail. Now, around the alleged £230 contribution by BAA, ALL of Fleet Street has again been publishing untruths and hypes. The question is: do these media, as typified by the London EVENING STANDARD and the Guardian as among the most zealous spinners for Crossrail, have any senses of editorial responsibility at all? We are beginning to get used to the BBC publishing more than one apology for the blunders that the Corporation indulges in at the expense of the licence-payers. But the newspapers who claim that they are against the greedy bankers who have brought about the current financial crisis, must show that THEY are not in hock to the lobby that wants £16 Billion of UK public money to be wasted. The same media outfits have an even bigger duty to ask why the Crossrail Bill was not allowed to be debated by the ‘Select Committees’ in BOTH Houses. Who had pulled the strings and when will the truth be ‘conceded’ by the ‘free thinking’ democracy-backing British media? After the looters who are poised to pocket £Billions under Contracts in the name of Crossrail have bolted?


By © Muhammad Haque 2005 Hrs GMT London Saturday 8 November 2008